Mobile Apps
Built for Both Stores
Flutter. React Native. Native.
Not every mobile app needs a different approach. The first question is always the framework: cross-platform or native, Flutter or React Native, and when native iOS or Android is justified over cross-platform. The answer depends on your team's existing expertise, your app's performance requirements, and whether you need access to platform APIs that cross-platform frameworks do not yet support. CV Infotech builds mobile apps in all four approaches. We recommend Flutter for most new cross-platform projects, React Native when the team already knows JavaScript, and native iOS or Android when the use case genuinely requires it. That recommendation is in the brief before any code is written.

Why the First Mobile App Decision Is the Framework, Not the Features
The most consequential decision in any mobile app project is the framework. It determines the language, the tooling, the hiring pool for future developers, the app's performance ceiling, and the cost of adding native device capabilities. Made correctly at the start, it is largely invisible, the app ships, performs well, and scales. Made incorrectly, it becomes a constraint that limits the app's evolution and eventually forces a rewrite. Most framework debates online are conducted by advocates for one technology over another. CV Infotech uses all four and recommends based on the project requirements.
Flutter is CV Infotech's default recommendation for new cross-platform projects in 2026. Flutter builds iOS and Android from a single Dart codebase using the Impeller rendering engine to produce native-performance UI. It does not wrap native components, it renders its own widgets, which means the UI is pixel-identical on iOS and Android. This is a significant advantage for apps with custom designs, complex animations, and high visual consistency requirements. 46% of cross-platform developers used Flutter in 2024 (Stack Overflow Developer Survey), making it the most widely adopted cross-platform framework. Our React Native development company is the right choice when your development team has deep JavaScript and React expertise. Rewriting your team's mental model to Dart costs time; if that cost exceeds the performance gain, Flutter is not the efficient choice for that project.
Native iOS (Swift) and native Android (Kotlin) development are appropriate when the app requires deep, cutting-edge platform capabilities that cross-platform frameworks do not yet support. ARKit depth APIs, HealthKit workout session data, Android Nearby Connections, and Core NFC with NDEF tag reading, these require native development. Binary size is a second consideration: Flutter adds approximately 5MB to the app binary, which matters in markets with low-storage devices or constrained app size budgets. For most business applications, cross-platform is the practical choice. Native is justified by specific technical requirements, not by a general preference.
Flutter: Flutter app development. React Native: React Native development. Framework comparison: Flutter vs React Native. iOS: iOS app development. Android: Android app development.
Framework-Agnostic Recommendation
We build in Flutter, React Native, Swift, and Kotlin. We recommend the right one for your project, not the one we happen to specialise in. The framework recommendation is made in the discovery call before any scope is agreed.
$30/Hour, All Four Frameworks
The same rate applies regardless of framework. Flutter, React Native, Swift, Kotlin, $30/hour. US mobile app agencies charge $100 to $200 per hour for the same work.
App Store Submission Included
Both App Store and Google Play submission are included in every mobile app project. No separate line item. Apple Developer account guidance, metadata preparation, review compliance, and staged rollout on Google Play.
512 Verified Reviews
Freelancer.com, 5.0, 14 years. The same quality that earned those reviews builds your mobile app, regardless of which framework it is built in.
Which Mobile App Do You Need?
Flutter Cross-Platform App
A single Dart codebase that produces native iOS and Android apps. Flutter by default for new cross-platform projects. Impeller rendering for high-performance 60fps UI. Expo-equivalent DX for Flutter projects via tools like FlutterFlow for prototyping. Our default recommendation.
Learn more: Flutter app developmentReact Native App
JavaScript or TypeScript cross-platform app. The right choice when the team has existing React expertise. New architecture (Fabric + JSI) stable since 0.71. Expo-recommended for most React Native projects.
Learn more: React Native developmentNative iOS App
Swift development for the iOS App Store. Full access to ARKit, HealthKit, Core NFC, and the complete iOS SDK. Smallest possible binary. Required for apps that need the deepest iOS integration.
Learn more: iOS app developmentNative Android App
Kotlin development for Google Play. Full access to Android APIs, Nearby Connections, Android Automotive, Bluetooth LE, and NFC. Required for deep Android hardware integration.
Learn more: Android app developmenteCommerce Mobile App
Shopify headless apps (Storefront API), WooCommerce mobile apps (REST API), and fully custom shopping apps. Your existing store connects to a native mobile sales channel.
Learn more: eCommerce app developmentStartup App MVP
Cross-platform MVP optimised for speed to market. One workflow built to a high standard before secondary features. 10-14 weeks to first App Store submission. Designed for user feedback, not perfection.
Learn more: Startup app developmentThe Mobile App Team That Uses All Four Frameworks and Recommends Based on Your Requirements
Most mobile app agencies tell you what they specialise in and scope your project to fit. An agency that only does Flutter will recommend Flutter. An agency that only does React Native will recommend React Native. CV Infotech builds in all four frameworks and uses them all in active production projects. The discovery call for a mobile app project starts with the framework question, and the answer is determined by your team's expertise, your technical requirements, and your timeline, not by which framework we happen to be most experienced in.
Mobile app development is the wrong approach if:
- —Your users can accomplish the core task on a mobile-responsive website (most B2B tools, admin interfaces)
- —Your expected user base is under 1,000, a web app is faster to build and easier to update
- —You need the app running in under 6 weeks (quality mobile development cannot be rushed to that timeline)
- —You need offline-first with complex sync, requires significant additional architecture that affects scope and cost
We will tell you if a web app serves your users better than a native app.
USA
EST-aligned. Apple Developer accounts are US-issued. AWS us-east-1. CCPA considerations for user data in apps. US services
UK
GMT. UK App Store. AWS eu-west-2. UK GDPR for user data collected in the app. UK services
AU
AEST overlap. AU App Store. AWS ap-southeast-2. Laura Maher: communication 10 out of 10. AU services
Biweekly Builds on Your Device
Every two-week sprint produces a TestFlight (iOS) or Firebase App Distribution (Android) build. You test the actual app on your phone, not a web preview or a screen share.
Framework Recommendation in the Brief
The framework choice is written into the project brief before any scope is agreed. If we recommend Flutter and you prefer React Native, we explain the trade-offs. You decide. We build.
300+ Apps Delivered
14 years. Same team. Cross-platform and native. The diversity of app types in that portfolio, eCommerce, SaaS, enterprise, startup, is why we can give an honest framework recommendation.
Post-Launch Maintenance Available
Monthly retainer from 4 hours/month. OS updates, dependency updates, App Store guideline changes, performance monitoring. The same team that built it maintains it.
From Mobile App Brief to Both App Stores
Every mobile app project starts with the framework decision, followed by a UX prototype before a line of native code is written.
Framework and Architecture Decision
Day 1Framework assessment: Flutter vs React Native vs native iOS/Android. We assess your team's existing expertise, your app's technical requirements, and your timeline to make a framework recommendation with a written rationale. Architecture: monolith vs micro-frontend, offline support requirements, push notification strategy.
Scope and Quote
Days 2-7Every screen, every user flow, every API integration, every third-party SDK mapped to hours. App Store submission included explicitly in the scope. Post-launch maintenance options presented.
UX Design and Prototype
Weeks 1-3Figma prototype covering every key user flow. Platform-specific UX conventions applied: iOS navigation patterns, Android Material You. Approved before any native code is written.
Development Sprints
Weeks 3-16Two-week sprints. Biweekly build deployed to TestFlight and Firebase App Distribution. You install and test the real app on your device at every sprint close. Backend API (if in scope) developed in parallel and integrated at each sprint.
QA and Performance
Weeks 14-16Cross-device testing: iPhone 15, iPhone 12, Samsung Galaxy S24, Samsung Galaxy A54, Google Pixel 7. Payment flow testing with real transactions in test mode. Push notification delivery on iOS and Android. 60fps performance on mid-range Android (Galaxy A54), not just flagship.
App Store Submission
Weeks 15-18App Store Connect setup, screenshots, metadata, review compliance. Google Play Console setup, app bundle, content rating, staged rollout. Both stores submitted simultaneously. Post-submission support during Apple review period.
Mobile App Development, Frequently Asked Questions
iOS and Android. Built for Both. Delivered at $30/Hour.
The discovery call covers framework choice, scope, and timeline. We produce a written framework recommendation and quote within 48 hours. No upfront commitment. $30/hour. 512 verified 5.0 reviews. Laura Maher (Australia): communication 10 out of 10.